![]() ![]() Would this fit to your recommendation? I had never before to deal with DUID stuff et al with a Fritzbox before. ![]() PS: Not sure whether I missed something but where could I have found the information, that and how the RADV logic has been changed so that the old configs of <= 18.7 can not be obtained 1:1 anymore?Ĭode: Feb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: restartingįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: Start address releaseįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: Sending Releaseįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: Received REPLY for RELEASEįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: status code: successįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: dhcp6c RELEASE on igb1 - running newipv6įeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: Sending Solicitįeb 17 16:44:37 OPNsense dhcp6c: unknown or unexpected DHCP6 option opt_86, len 16įeb 17 16:44:38 OPNsense dhcp6c: Sending Requestįeb 17 16:44:38 OPNsense dhcp6c: unknown or unexpected DHCP6 option opt_86, len 16įeb 17 16:44:38 OPNsense dhcp6c: Received REPLY for REQUESTįeb 17 16:44:38 OPNsense dhcp6c: invalid prefix length 62 + 4 + 64įeb 17 16:44:38 OPNsense dhcp6c: dhcp6c REQUEST on igb1 - running newipv6Ĭode: Feb 17 15:50:08 OPNsense dhcpd: RTSOLD script - Starting dhcp6 client for interface wan(igb1)įeb 17 15:50:08 OPNsense dhcpd: RTSOLD script - Sending SIGHUP to dhcp6c for interface wan(igb1)įeb 17 15:50:08 OPNsense dhcp6c: restartingįeb 17 15:50:09 OPNsense dhcp6c: Sending Solicitįeb 17 15:50:09 OPNsense dhcp6c: unknown or unexpected DHCP6 option opt_86, len 16įeb 17 15:50:10 OPNsense dhcp6c: Sending Requestįeb 17 15:50:10 OPNsense dhcp6c: unknown or unexpected DHCP6 option opt_86, len 16įeb 17 15:50:10 OPNsense dhcp6c: Received REPLY for REQUESTįeb 17 15:50:10 OPNsense dhcp6c: invalid prefix length 62 + 8 + 64įeb 17 15:50:10 OPNsense dhcp6c: dhcp6c REQUEST on igb1 - running newipv6 ![]() Īt least for some of my use cases, this would be very sad. If yes, is my assumption right that Opnsense would not possible to be used as cascaded router with SLACC anymore. However, I would assume that this can not be wanted necessarily: Is this size of 62 either hardcoded or calculated out of the number of interfaces? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |